In a weekend filled with upset after upset, we struggled early defensively and saw a few offensive drives stall out before finally waking up and destroying an overmatched Ole Miss team. It was scary for a while but the end result was far better than the one that awaited half of the top 15. This week is a chance for revenge on a team that hung 50+ on us in Athens last year. This isn’t the same UT team we saw last season and they’re reeling a bit at .500, but Fulmer’s teams play us best when no one is giving them a shot, so this will be as scary as ever.
About
the Ole Miss game
Where do you start to describe this game? The score was not at all indicative
of the struggle we had on our hands. Ole Miss carried over all the momentum
they established in the UF game and came out ready. They utilized that massive
OL to open huge holes in our DL all day, which allowed their RBs to get yardage
in chunks, which in turn opened up their passing game. Just a rough day defensively
for us, but you have to give it to Ole Miss. They played extremely well offensively.
Their QB was accurate and smart, rarely miscuing on attempts and constantly
putting his guys in good position to make a play on the ball. His opening TD
toss was thrown as perfectly as you’ll ever see one. Great coverage on
that but you can’t defend the perfect pass. The defense rose up in the
end though, and coupled with our explosive offense, we were able to turn a tight
game into a rout.
Speaking of that offense, wow, I don’t know what to say. Yeah, we gave
up two sacks (on the same series, although one was a scramble that almost got
back to the line), but the OL once again played tremendously. Our RBs had some
holes and when they didn’t, they seemed to make their own. When you average
over 7 ypc as a team, something is obviously working. I don’t recall two
RBs each being as effective as what we saw Saturday. Both were lethal. Brown
seemed to feed off the energy of Knowshon and played like a guy having fun,
trying to make folks miss as opposed to playing like the little back that always
tries to prove he’s not little by running folks over. It was just an all
around solid offensive performance against a defense that was overmatched. This
was one of the rare games of the Richt era that you could make a strong case
for the offense winning the game when the defense was scuffling. Yeah the defense
only gave up 17 points, but once we got up multiple scores in the 2nd half,
it took Ole Miss away from their ground game that had been working so well.
Perhaps the most impressive thing all day was our drive in the 3rd quarter that
saw us answer their TD that tied it at 17. We went 80 yards in 2:23 and only
used 8 plays, picking up yardage in chunks (7 of the 8 plays were for 1st downs
or TDs). Unreal. It was a solid win in a typical trap game…now on to Knoxville
for a little payback (hopefully).
UT Offense
This UT offense is not a prototypical UT offense, especially ones under OC
David Cutcliffe. They have a veteran, senior QB, a handful of RBs that are serviceable,
an OL that has played pretty well, but they don’t have that deep threat
at WR, a longtime strength of the UT offense. Traditionally with UT you could
count on solid RBs, solid OL and a fleet of amazing WRs. Not so this year.
At QB, Eric Ainge is the senior starter that heads the UT attack. He led UT
to wins over UGA in Athens in both 2004 and 2006. He’s a smart, accurate
passer that occasionally gets rattled but for the most part plays with considerable
poise. He’s not a threat to run, but if the play breaks down he’ll
do a good job of going where they ain’t (so to speak). He’s really
blossomed under Cutcliffe. He hasn’t been the reason behind UT’s
offensive struggles this season. After struggling under Randy Sanders in ‘04
and being benched in ’05, Cutcliffe came in to work with the QBs again
and Ainge responded with a 67% completion percentage last year. He’s over
66% this season, although his yards per attempt are down significantly (in large
part due to his diminished WR corps. On the year he’s thrown 10 TDs to
only 2 INTs. He loves throwing quick timing routes to his WRs on slants and
outs, etc. Aside from the debacle that was his 2005 season, he’s had an
outstanding career, due in no small part to his performances in Athens.
At RB, UT sports a bevy of capable backs, with Jr. Arian Foster leading the
way. The big 6-1, 225 pounder is an experienced back that suffered through an
injury-plagued 2006 (yet somehow managed 3 TDs against us last year), but has
bounced back to average 5.0 ypc this season. He’s only topped the 100-yd
mark once this season (against Southern Miss), but he’s a big-play threat
every time he touches the ball. LaMarcus Coker (2nd in carries and yards), Lennon
Creer and Montario Hardesty provide incredible depth and allow the offense to
sustain a TB injury with ease. The top 3 backs all average right at 5.0 ypc
or better. Their top 4 RBs average over 4 receptions per game combined, so look
for their involvement in the passing game as well.
The UT receiver corps is a shadow of the units they’ve put out in the
past. The loss of Meachem, Swain and Smith and their nearly 2,500 yards receiving
has seen a dropoff in individual receiver production, but overall, they’ve
actually been decent statistically. Each of their top 3 receivers has already
topped his career numbers on this short season. WRs Lucas Taylor, Austin Rogers
and Josh Briscoe each have over 20 receptions so far. Taylor leads the team
in receptions and yards with 24 and 382 respectively. His 15.9 ypc are also
the best on the team. He’s also gone over 100 yards receiving in every
game except UF. TE Chris Brown has been a steady if unspectacular performer
his whole career. He’s found the endzone this season, with 4 TDs, doubling
his career total.
The UT OL is a nice mix of veterans and young guys. They have good size, averaging
just over 300 pounds a man. They’ve only given up a couple of sacks this
season, which has as much to do with their scheme as it does their talent. Short
drops and quick passes don’t give the DL much time to get to the QB. Considering
how much they’ve thrown the ball though, the fact they’ve only given
up 2 sacks is impressive. This OL is prototypical in terms of size and given
Fulmer’s past as an OL himself, he’s always seemed to have solid
OLs. This one is no different.
Comments